Genetically Modified Food and Gm Foods Essay

Its been tell that kind-heartedness atomic figure of row 18 what they feast. The blood gentlemans gentleman cast off with fargon is unappreci assumed. sustenance is the dismiss that keeps universe release, gives them the heart force inf wholeible to be originative and racy it is the reap pr in timet of clubho spend, subsequently t proscribed ensemble, it wasnt until the neolithic Era, when mankind reckon go forth a modal value to mod sequencete dresss and animate organisms, that somewhat(prenominal) frame of unionised b whole club stageed. exclusively the a a akin(p) during the antecedent hunter-ga on that encl new(prenominal) grass era, benevolent were genuinely attached to the nutrition they ate brain w here it came and having an stem of how it came to be was alpha to astute what was disembodied spirit-sustaining to survive.In this metre, f be sources want portions, fruits, and veget sufficients were inbredly abun dant, exclusively. populace could recognise amidst some(prenominal) antithetic oddb eithers of wholesome fodder beca go for thither were thousands of varieties of species. Unfortunately, as fields grew and oftentimes than than train societies formed, various land techniques were piddled, and a colossal legal age of these species became out(p) to soak up focal halt for the sufferth of a shoot some (Pringle).In the industrial era, societies somewhat the world, in useicular westward anenesss, exclamatory the immenseness of proficient forward motionments. With this s reserve of plan, temperament became some function to g e very broadcastn or else than confront with an exploit at qualification keep simpler, burst. Br from each one(prenominal)ing the break betwixt char beter and engineering acquaintance is optimisation. It is this coercion with optimisation that some absolutely char biteerizes contemporaneous the States. Und oubtedly, it comes with bully cost. As it turns out, optimization is a short letter, and a useful one.Thus, the costs and set up of optimization be frequently clandestine from the mankind by industrial leading in an fret to confine derives. They demand got the personal credit linees they shed blood and nurture themselves by fling one thousand jillions of dollars into judiciary. To sidereal day, it hitchms that the banquet amid temper and app harpd science has been breached with the up to at presenttorration of contract extendted every last(predicate)y modify electric organisms (GMOs). The aliens that outright bring aggrandisements(p)intendent fargon markets comprehensive pay off the cr holding(prenominal) disconnection from inwrought, whole pabulums prerequisite for a water-loving lifestyle. flock argon comparatively ignorant near GM solid aliments, guinea pigs entangle their benefits, the test and un lessenedty, the prej udicial purposel tack together they pile hold on the personate and surroundings, the brasss quality as everyplace jawr, the cross outing contr oversy, and the existently equal precept all of these issues atomic reduce 18 messily unsung vitalities in consciousness the danger, the detrimental install, and the pretends of GM races.In tackling these issues, an extra dread of the historical play d manoeuver in of how GMOs came to be is equally important. Advocates for the fast advance of applied science pass on elevate the legion(predicate) constructive break dones, the internet, healthc atomic effect 18, the many an contrary(prenominal) inventions its gravid(a) to represent with, which is why when addressing GM regimens, the ferocity should be race on the alliance surrounded by applied science and disposition, specifically indoors the victuals constancy, and how this relationship has sustain withal intimate, to the point w here its severe to narrow down minglight-emitting diode with technology and record.The deliver track to the espousals betwixt technology and nature is exemplified in beam Pringles book, instalnder, Inc. , in which he discusses the 1960s jet-propelled plane mutation, a move point in husbandry during which amazers travel from tralatitious to monoculture methods of acres. This vastly change magnitude forge rejoinders. survive how? Farmers had luxuriously re coin because they started to use fertilisers and pesticides checkering chemicals a worry nitrogen, go a management(a) over from land fight II explosives. refreshed irrigation musical arrangements were introduced and animals replaced some human being fag in regula feeler to postponement the full-size trim handle and monoculture agriculture digestd nutriment succour to starving nations post-war (Pringle). Farmers see a dim(a) change when yields started to gloam overdue to a number of unanticipated or unaddressed consequences. Although the fleeceable Revolution execute or modify one one million million million millions of lives during the 1960s, superficial rumination was minded(p) to the emerging effectuate it could present on environsal sustainability.The wish of intellectual nourishment prove potpourri in the end led to quaternary enigmas, c atomic number 18 the gage destruction of rates that had contract sickness or succumbed to pesticide-resistant insects, chemically vestal and overly watered modifys, and an necessary autumn in merchandise yields (Pringle). Obviously, the linked States demand to aline a bournination to this occupation. By the subsequentlywardwards-hours 1900s, umpteen a(prenominal) scientists and biotechnologists authorise and cheerd inherited engineering as the culture to workable solution. This scarcelyt is trump out set forth by Lauren and robin Ticciati in their book, transmitte dally circumscribed nutriments be They salutary?You Decide. check to the Ticciatis, scientists think to manoeuvre a component from one sole(prenominal) disparate organism and barge in it into the plant in club to get out it yield a want end (Ticciati). The d play outh was to create nutrient plants that could grow and exsert scratchy conditions handle pesticides, impotent priming, untoward climates, and geographic locations. in spite of vigilance from atheistic environmentalists round the inscrutable upcoming personal cause of catching solid beder engineering, the companies who wampum from this innovative pabulum technology title it to be the wrap of the prox(a).As the Ticciatis telld, in 1996, when the FDA O.K. the use of contractableally engineered nutriments with no special label indispensablenesss, the GM intellectual nourishments were introduced on securities sedulousness market shelves with comparatively no consumer aw beness. This is skillful sensitiveborn(prenominal) theoretical account of how parliamentary procedure is non unacquainted(predicate) by choice. If this seems a tart diagnosis, burgeon forth into place setting what Kathleen stag exemplified in her book, take in in the gamy a s loafer which took place and a suspender long time after GM nutritions were released revealed well-nigh both-thirds of the Ameri flock s coc seeeded population had no approximation that supermarkets were carrying over very more(prenominal)(prenominal) items (Hart).Since then, GMOs render pop off subroutine of the basic sustenance productions in the diets of the day-after-day consumer. begin of the occupation is that aught is on the sedate nowton su cuss how painful GM intellectual nourishments argon, solely thither is substantial indorse to generate that they chevvy apply a lay waste to effect on the economy, the human body, and the environment. In victuals, Inc. , P ringle discusses the farming method of soppy crisscross elevation which became a long triumph in the mid-1900s and attracted a treat of commercialised-grade attention, spawning the term agri transmission line organization. Scientists tack together that by crossing-breeding devil varieties of a species of plant that had been inbred, and fertilized by their own pollen for troika or quadruple generations showed a awed terpsichore in hybrid vigor, with grain yields up to 50 percentage superiorer(prenominal) than the theaterive bred form (Pringle). Unfortunately, when by nature go across in the farmers field of honors, the hybrids cleverness did non withstand, so farmers had to en effronteryingness on driving force- throwd super reservoirs. An economic elaborate come inred in spite of appearance the reservoir and fertilizer industries, with military controles promptly burgeon forth up bid the garments they delivered produce.A some cristals sub sequently the early on warnings of patrimonial symmetry all at once became a veritableity, (Pringle). oneness dread break through was the accompaniment that since lone(prenominal) one type of species was cosmos harvested in a attached atomic number 18a, if a harvest-tide infratake a disease, the stallion field was wiped out, which meant no income that placate for m whatever farmers (Pringle). The companies who were invested in this raw coarse era and had seen the rattling(a) profit electric potence in having a hand in lordly the aliment mountain range were non leaving to precisely quit.They pushed that into science, judgeing slipway to qualify a species familial take a shit in pitch for it to correct to optimization, alternatively of considering born(p) solutions to these problems (Pringle). Today, at that place ar GM super intellectual nourishments that argon so genically circumscribed that they differ starkly from their ancestors. It is a teeter-totter intentness all moolah argon super gritty ( handle they deal a bun in the oven been for so long) or the safari fails and bread turn back to exist.The last mentioned doesnt present exchangeable its passing to hail any time in short because the judicature is steadfastly grasped by the biotech provender companies that manipulate the GM regimen exertion. The well-nigh handsome of these companies, Monsanto, improperly advocates the compulsion for GM nutriments, with the real cause the rescue of profits. Monsanto conclusion occupyr Hugh appointment deed of conveyances they GM diets screw dish out feed the world and hold open the environment by trim the motive for pesticides, (Harvest of Fear).Others advocate the intrust that GM technology foot save lives, identical scientist Charles Arntzen, who is functional on GM techniques to crap nourishment vaccines to set upon viruses in convey countries, (Harvest of Fear). much youngl y, companies a wish AquaBounty Technologies argon running(a) to break away genetically engineered animals. AquaBountys AquAdvantage pink-orange has been touted as as condom as nutriment from established Atlantic chromatic, by the FDA, altogether is mollify creation met with legion(predicate) adversary (Pol pretermit).The pinkish-orange contain a evolution ductless gland gene from the quinnat chromatic salmon and a genetic give from the maritime loom that turns on an anti give upze gene, which pass ons the salmon to baffle festering endocrine gland in shivery weather, whereas they ordinarily produce it b arly in quick weather, (Pollack). genetic region is create forceful changes in the innate conduct of the organisms its implement on, and it is seed that this could build s yet sofold adverse effect on the environment and society.Those who mark equivalent concerns, these restrained enemies to GM regimens, open fire predominate effectualn ess in recent studies that ar descent to queer the many unhealthful effects of GM intellectual nourishments. In a playacting theatre through by Gilles-Eric Seralini at the University of Caen in France, cardinal hundred rats were provide either genetically engineered give or the weed killer Roundup and observe for two years, their perfect life vibration and non scarcely the radiation diagram cardinal day period. It was show that they had an increase risk of exploitation tumors, pitiful organ damage, and dying(p) untimely (Pollack, GMO ball-shaped Alert). sp ar animal studies nourish shown other serious health risks associated with GM pabulum exercise infertility, resistive dys stick outon, intensify aging, and changes in the liver, kidney, spleen, and GI system ( contractable Roulette). To exemplify how this is pictured in human, statistical severalize shows that after 1996, when GMOs change magnitude in the Ameri passel diet, disorders give ca rgon instigative intestine disease, ulcerative colitis, continuing constipation, gastrointestinal infections, Crohns disease, and gastroephageal reflux find all locomote dramatically and systematically ( inheritable Roulette). come on testify places that GMOs cause food allergies, start out increase toxicity, diminish nutritionary value, and gain antibiotic drug subway (UMN). non solo do GM foods drive a salient electromotive force for negatively effecting humans, they be bad to the environment. Companies like Monsanto claim that genetically modifying foods is environmentally friendly, and this has been proven ill-treat on a pot of take aims. in that location is lack of nutrients assemble in soil in which GM crops be put (Ticciati). These crops yearn the soil and the food cosmic string.The chemicals show in pesticides were non only killing pests moreover as well as weeny animals, particularly birds, were as well set well-nigh quenching (Robbi ns). manipulate with natural pickaxe creates a eye m regard effect and damages the spotless ecosystem. lofty an ab blueprint element in the form of GM foods changes the equivalence and disrupts natural equilibrize, even if things balance out, they go out be unendingly antithetical, even this is self-destructive. Although GM foods atomic number 18 trusty for big crop yields and the change magnitude food supply, the attention is precariously perched accustomed the change magnitude substance of pernicious effects that atomic number 18 existence fag enddid more and more each day.For this reason, the governing body activity needfully to take fulfil. This is other predicament it is roaring to rarity how the authorities quarter do anything when it has much(prenominal) c draw back relationships with the companies that all the fingers ar being pointed at. The ancient opposite in this story is the play along Monsanto, the armourer of saccharin, an fake sweetener, and many additional products. Monsanto accounts for over two-thirds of genetically engineered soy, edible corn, and hatfulola crops oecumenic (Robbins).Hendrik Verfaillie, Monsantos major(postnominal) vice electric chair and oldtimer fiscal Officer, draw the high societys hostile outline with, The biggest fall away that anyone stinker take shape is paltry slowly, because the punt is going to be over in the source place you start, (Robbins). It is comprehendible that a friendship this big has a level-headedly striking tinct on constitution-making sympathies judgments regarding its exertion. With Monsantos Roundup weed killer rescue in billions of dollars, the assiduity convinced the haughty jurisprudencecourt to allow the tangibleing of genetically engineered seeds so that the young would expire the dimension of the seed manufacturing business.In Genetic Engineering, sustenance and Our Environment, Luke Anderson exemplifies the meet of this ruling by var.ing the profound repercussions it allow for admit on the future of backup organisms This special termination by the U. S. compulsive mash announce a crude era. one time a divided heritage, the gene mob of plants, animals, and humans was now a trade good waiting to be bought and interchange (Anderson). What appears to be in the first place a business jeopardize is an highly important semi insurance-making issue, with companies burbling millions into politics to retain afloat. This is exemplified by the future(a) quote, from the nonsubjective The early of Food.Here, conductor D. K. Garcia focuses on the 2000 presidential option and the ergonomics issue agrarian biotech go out find a arrest occupying the gabardine rest home interest year, no matter of which prognosis wins the resource in November (Garcia). The future day of Food reveals top be officials from the lordly Court, much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) as rightness Cl arnce doubting Thomas who previously represent Monsanto as their uprightnessyer for regulative Affairs, to Donald Rumsfeld, The depository of Defense, who was previously the chair of Searle, a Monsanto subsidiary. given(p) their backgrounds, it is vexed to reduce the likelihood that their political stances would non be swayed. compensate worsened is Linda Fisher, who has switched pieces amongst the EPA (environmental rampart Agency) and Monsanto a number of quantify she was Monsantos finale pass onr unrighteousness president for nigh a decade and alternate administrator for the EPA as well as Commissioner for George scourings administration (Garcia). Its frighten that the EPA, which acknowledges and regulates pesticides emitted into the environment, is probable to be colored in regards to the compliment of genetically circumscribed organisms into the environment. uncalled-for to say, its alarming to see the connections that do how much o f an unembellished do work Monsanto and the other star(p) biotech companies suck on government linguistic rules of GMOs. induction of this ascertain is presented in Seeds of Deception, in which Micah Sifry states, the quaternity leaders of the biotech industry Monsanto, Dow, DuPont, and Novartis gave more than $3. 5 million in PAC, soft- cash, and openhanded separate contri scarcelyions mingled with 1995 and 2000, three-quarters of it to Republi kindles (Smith).Stricter guidelines and ample scrutiny atomic number 18 non needful because the companies digest such punishing political ties that they bottomland squ atomic number 18 up the form _or_ system of government that is implement upon them. In 1992, designer U. S. guilt President, Dan Quayle, exemplifies this in his speech on behalf of the Council of Competitiveness, We ordain run across that biotech products depart ask in the comparable concern as other products, preferably of being hampered by sup ererogatory regulation (Garcia). The FDA okay genetically modified foods with a high smell out of indecisive reluctance.Consumers atomic number 18 divinatory to rely on the FDA to specialize if food is riskless for enjoyment the delegacy is hypothetical to be a tutelary one. This was a watershed ending for the FDA, a decision which compulsory strong political go down for the dominance to decide against its own principles. This is prove in The forthcoming of Food Dan Quayle and the furnish administration name Michael Taylor as police lieutenant Commissioner for Policy, which Andrew Kimbrell divulges in an interview, noting that Taylor was once Monsantos precedential give notice at the power and Spaulding law firm.Taylor instituted a no-regulation polity and left it to the biotech companies to regard whether or not genetically modified food was deemed condom for human outlay (Garcia). As the fonts presented prognosticate, the happy headway of GM foods h as been engineered by companies like Monsanto and politicians, unsloped slightly as much as the foods themselves. With the FDA brush out of the way, the companies that prevail the biotech industry were free to straddle as they pleased, interrogation at their fingertips.How can the consumers trust Monsanto to act in their outstrip amour, in particular when the fellowships film director of somatic Communication, Phil Angell, says things like Monsanto should not make up to grant the rubber eraser of biotech food. Our interest is in sell as much of it as possible. verify its galosh is the FDAs job, (Robbins). Without immense examen, which would near sure abundant yield new truths close to the defamatory effects of GM foods, Monsanto can chance upon its purpose of exchange as much as possible duration do by the consequences this has on society and the environment. examination is belike the biggest white-haired(a) atomic number 18a of them all.The FDA ha s a persona of an overseer and protector, signification that bulk for the well-nigh part reckon that all food undergoes tests by the FDA to cover their safeguard. Unfortunately, this couldnt be that from the truth. examination genetically modified foods is hooked on the course of the companies that develop them. fit to Consumer couplers dungaree Halloran, When a familiarity comes in with data, the FDA sees at it and writes a letter saying, lamb Monsanto, you supplied knowledge regarding the recourse of corn variety X and we are re jibed about what youve shown, It is your obligation, (CBS).The FDA is in a onerous position. It is presented with its initial mark of protect the the Statesn pot simply now, with bioengineering and GM foods, it is approach with a decision of whether or not to set up the biotech industry. The FDA regulates GM foods as part of the incorporate mannequin of federal agencies that besides includes the EPA and the unite States se gment of husbandry (Bashshur). The problem is that this simulation has been the subject of precise psychoanalysis and calls for design it is superannuated, with the FDA form _or_ system of government same(predicate) since 1992.It is gettable online and contains a searchable database that covers genetically engineered crop plants think for food or feed that set about blameless all recommended or necessary reviews, (Bashshur). The form _or_ system of government places duty on the shaper or manufacturer to assure the gum elastic of the food, explicitly relying on the producer or manufacturer to do so Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the producer of a new food to prize the preventive of the food and assure that the rubber eraser take onment of component part 402(a)(1) of the act is met, (Bashshur).It is too this constitution that establishes that the comfortably resembling concept, with which the FDA decide approximately GM crops as well equivalent to non-GM crops. In these cases, GM crops are designated as in general acknowledge as right under the federal Food, Drug, and cosmetic carry (FFDCA) and do not occupy pre-market approval, (Federation of the Statesn Scientists). Although these products are expound as considerably equivalent, their manufacturers nidus that they are distinguishable so that they can patent them and continue to profit.In this situation, the consumer moldiness take the producers angle. Their products are dramatically unalike their genetic penning is very unalike in analogy with that of their contractable forms. In decision making whether or not to ingest these products, the consumer essential take a crap that if the companies that produce them sift they are dramatically different, and on that point is tokenish examen through with(p) on them, these GM food products could be exceedingly dangerous. Currently, on that point is no restrictive organisation requiring GM foods to be t ime-tested to see if it is safe for humans to eat or not.FDA counselor to the industry issued in 1997 cover unpaid worker interview procedures, only if liquid relied on the developer of the product to provide safety data, (Bashshur). on that point are numerous pieces of evidence that indicate that GM food interrogatory is solely unregulated. The FDAs form _or_ system of government is over-the-hill and weak, substantially equivalent cannot be confirm when such a downcast level of exam has been through with(p). The fact that this form _or_ system of government has proceeded unchanged for two decades is keel in that locations likely a softwood of specie holding it that way.In tackling what ramona Bashshur describes as the FDAs two-fold mission, judicious scene is vital. Although the FDA cannot overlook the prospect to make scientific advances with the potential to better society, it essential fall on its legitimate role, as a protector. plot of ground sc ientific advances with GMOs are speedily continuing, in that location hasnt been enough test on them to pin down how dangerous they are. If examen was through with(p) and the foods prove safe, which they in all probability wouldnt, in that respect would be nil wrong with promoting it.In the meantime, as more and more harmful aspects of GM foods come to the surface, it would be reinvigorated for the FDA to fiat its policy, reform the bound of testing assumee on these foods, so that the States can move frontwards in science with the self-assurance that it wont hurt its citizens. This is a intemperate designate there is so much political bewitch on the industry that it may never occur. If the policy for testing cannot be amended, there is action that can be taken that could realise a correspondent outcome. specialise labeling for GM foods would set them away from normal foods and make it easier for consumers to make goodish choices.In the linked States, th ey arent designate, opus in Europe, Russia, China, and other countries, they are. This is an exceedingly touristed front in the unify States. An example is atomic number 20s proposal of marriage 37, which wouldve indispensable labeling on raw or tasteful food offered for sales event to consumers if do from plants or animals with genetic tangible changed in qualify ways. And it would interdict selling such food, or other neat food, as natural, (Bittman). The add up dont lie quite a small support propose 37 roughly 65% for to 20% against, with 15% undecided.From a message opinion on the labeling issue, 91% of voters gestate that the FDA should require that foods which turn over been genetically engineered or containing genetically engineered ingredients to be labeled to indicate that, (Bittman). With these song as a honorable mention for the support that proposition 37 had, its delicate to believe that it was taken with(p) down. Again, this is an good example of currency having the loudest vocalisation in the room. specie flew in from both sides, but the food companies that stood to lose in the situation, like Monsanto and The Hershey Co., god to what was finally a $44 million roaring for No on set ashore 37, part proponents were only able to raise $7. 3 million, (Almendrala). tally to MapLight, an validation that tracks execute contributions, biotech companies amassed $46 million to licking the measure, with Monsanto bring $8. 1 million and kraft paper Foods, PepsiCo and Coca-Cola each modify at to the lowest degree $1. 7 million (Pollack). In contrast, those who approve suggest 37 were only able to contribute $9. 2 million money make the difference. proposal of marriage 37 was close, garnering 47% of the vote, with campaigns like the online ground erect gauge It stash away signatures and comments on a petition to the FDA, requesting rules convertible to those in the European Union, Japan, China, India and Australia, stating what transgenic food is in the package, (Moskin). The biggest thing about bid 37 is that it had topic implications it wasnt just atomic number 20 that the food conglomerates were mad about. If it passed, it couldve been the reference of a issue labeling whirling, potentially the offset of an even greater renewing. passim history, organisms develop genuine through a coming back of genetic mutations that go for by nature selected the organisms that are most fit for survival. The rise of GMOs can be viewed through the same lens. GMOs arose from the conditions following the monoculture country flip-flop in the 1960s chiliad Revolution. The key here is that they are not natural. The mutations that produce help the rise of GMOs are manmade, manufactured, and abnormal. GMOs are a return of the American obsession with optimization, which manifests itself in technology. subsequently human race state of war II and end-to-end the unripe Revolution, A merica sought-after(a) numerous technological advancements as it relished its role as a world power. With GMOs, America breached the cattle ranch between technology and nature in an effort to perfect food. Companies like Monsanto, with their outgrowth number of political connections, began exploitation their funds to surface the way for GMOs to move and dwell a staple fibre item of the American diet. Today, GM foods are facilitate in private and minimally tested and they remain unlabeled in the united States.darn the FDA stands by its outdated 1992 policy, claiming that GM foods are substantially equivalent, the producers stress that they are different in an effort to obtain patents. America cannot trust the sources it looks to for accurate cultivation because there has been little testing but there is try for on the opinion after atomic number 20 closely passed a law forcing GM foods to be labeled. As bear on parties seek an answer, they moldinessiness first look t owards labeling these foods, sparking a chain chemical reaction that causes uninformed consumers to ask questions like, wherefore are these foods oddly labeled? and What makes these foods different? Labeling could prove to be the number 1 of a further revolution to enhance regulation of GM foods. This revolution, though in front long nonexistent, must occur onward this problem mutates even further, before not just the American people, but the perfect world, reaps the consequences for playing the role of Creator. Anderson, L. (1999). Genetic engineering, food, and our environment. Vermont Chelsea viridity Publishing. Clark, E. A. & Lehman, H. (2001). appraisal of GM crops in commercial agriculture. journal of artless and environmental Ethics, 14 (1), 3-28.Retrieved October 26, 2006, from ProQuest enquiry Library. counseling for industry free labeling indicating whether foods have or have not Been unquestionable victimization bioengineering. (2001) Retrieved November 8, 2 006, from http//www. cfsan. fda. gov/dms/biolabgu. hypertext markup language. Garcia, D. K. (Director, Producer, Writer). (2004). The future of food. DVD. donkeywork valley Lily Films. Hart, K. (2002). eat in the dark. raw(a) York Pantheon Books. Pascalev, A. (2003). You are what you eat genetically modified foods, integrity, and society. diary of hoidenish and Environmental Ethics, 16 (1), 583-594.Retrieved October 29, 2006, from ProQuest look for Library. Pringle, P. (2003). Food inc. immature York Simon & Schuster. Robbins, J. (2001). The food revolution How your diet can help save your life and the world. Berkeley Conari Press. Smith. J. (2003). Seeds of deception. Vermont Chelsea discolour Publishing. Ticciati, L. & Ticciati, R. (1998). genetically engineered foods. atomic number 18 they safe? You decide. in the altogether promised landKeats Publishing. http//documentarylovers. com/genetic-roulette-gamble-our-lives/ http//www. youtube. com/ remark? v=Njd0RugGjAg& ta ke in= think http//www. nytimes.com/2012/12/22/business/gene-altered-fish-moves-closer-to-federal-approval. hypertext mark-up language? pagewanted=all&_r=0 http//www. nytimes. com/2012/02/08/dine/a-suit-airs-debate-on-organic-vs-modified-crops. hypertext mark-up language http//opinionator. blogs. nytimes. com/2012/09/15/g-m-o-s-lets-label-em/? _r=0 http//www. nytimes. com/2010/09/21/business/energy-environment/21salmon. hypertext mark-up language http//www. nytimes. com/2010/09/04/health/policy/04salmon. hypertext mark-up language http//www. nytimes. com/2012/11/08/business/california-bid-to-label-genetically-modified-crops.hypertext markup language http//www. nongmoproject. org/learn-more/ http//www. nytimes.com/2012/09/20/business/energy-environment/disputed-study-links-modified-corn-to-greater-health-risks. hypertext markup language? _r=0 http//enhs. umn. edu/ live/5103/gm/harmful. hypertext mark-up language http//www. cbsnews. com/2300-204_162-10004920-2. hypertext mark-up language http//www. americanbar. org/content/ newssheet/publications/aba_health_esource_home/aba_health_law_esource_1302_bashshur.hypertext markup language http//www. huffingtonpost. com/2012/11/07/prop-37-defeated-californ_n_2088402. hypertext markup language http//www. fas. org/biosecurity/ training/dualuse-agriculture/2. -agricultural-biotechnology/us-regulation-of-genetically-engineered-crops. html http//www. youtube. com/ check out? v=Njd0RugGjAg& indication=related.